Implied
Volatility
The implied volatility is the volatility
the
option
is actually trading at. In other words, the
actual market price of the option assumes a certain
volatility which is termed the implied volatility.
By knowing the market price we can work backward
using the Black Scholes model and determine
what volatility the option is trading at for the
given market price.
Many options traders use the implied volatility as the best guess
estimate of the future volatility. They feel the
implied volatility is the market volatility and the
best estimate of the future volatility. The implied
volatility can be different for each option.
Sometimes the volatilities are skewed with higher and lower strikes
having different implied volatilities than in the
money strikes.
There may be other reasons for the skew in implied volatilities:
-
Many people like
to buy cheap out of the money calls and puts but do
not always like to sell them for the small amount of
premium they receive. It is more difficult for
option traders to hedge with far out of the money
options so the premiums are sometimes greater.
-
The distribution
of prices may affect the skew of option prices. If
prices are lognormal distributed and there is a
bullish bias to the market, out of the money calls
should have higher premiums than corresponding out
of the money puts. An out of the money call has a greater chance of being in the money than an out of the money
put which is an equal distance from a future if
prices exhibit lognormal behavior.
-
Some traders believe markets become more volatile as prices increase.
If the volatility increases as a market moves higher
and declines as a market moves lower, options should
have skews reflecting this.
These are some of the reasons options sometimes exhibit skewed pricing,
but there is not always complete agreement as to the
importance of each factor.
The implied
volatility is definitely a good start in option
evaluation and deriving a good estimate of what the
volatility should be. But the implieds really
reflect the supply and demand situation of the
option much more than as a predictor of the future
volatility of the market. Let's look at an example
to understand this.
Assume a market has
been trading in a relatively stable way with an
actual historical volatility of 20%. The implied
volatilities of the options will probably be trading
somewhere in the same range of 20%. An unexpected
news report comes out and causes the market to soar
and trade around a 40% actual volatility. The
implied volatility of the options may jump to levels
much greater than 40%. This may happen because many
investors who were short options (and therefore
short volatility) may have to buy them back no
matter what the price or volatility of the option.
The investors may have to buy the options back due
to margin calls, severe losses, or other reasons,
and not necessarily because they anticipate even
higher actual volatilities.
Of
course the actual market volatility may increase to
even higher levels, but this does not mean that the
implied volatilities accurately predicted this.
Instead, the typical sellers who have just been
battered now require much higher premiums and,
consequently, higher implied volatilities to resume
selling volatility. The same type of situation
occurs when the volatility bubble collapses and
premiums Implode. The buyers are now the ones who
are hurt, and will not buy unless the premiums are
low enough to justify reentering the market.