If
mechanical trading systems work, why don't more
people use them? Or if they don't work, why do so
many people want them? Certain mechanical trading
systems can and do make money if traded by the right
person, but more often the investor gets frustrated
using the system and eventually ends up abandoning
it. Bad results may not necessarily be the fault of
the person or the system. The person may be
incompatible with the system.
Mechanical
trading systems require certain concessions from the
trader.
The trader must yield
to the signals of the system and surrender
control of the trading, but accept responsibility
for the resulting profits and losses of the system.
This relationship of lost control, but
responsibility for
actions, is fraught with conflict and will prove
tenuous at best.
We
do not want to consciously lose control of our
actions when trading, especially in an environment
which can be so chaotic and confusing. Of course,
anyone using a mechanical trading method has
ultimate control and may always override 'the
trading signals, but doing this too often eliminates
the need for the system in the first place.
A
trader wanting to use a mechanical system will find
a better chance for success with a system with rules
which are compatible with the way the trader thinks.
How can a system think? It can't, but a trader
should look for a system that provides trading
signals similar to the way the investor would view
or trade the market. For example, a trader who is
used to fading the market (buying weakness and
selling strength) should not look for a
trend-following system (buy strength and sell
weakness), but instead investigate countertrend
systems.
Most
people pick the system with the best track record
and then try to live with it. This is no different
from choosing a blind date who looks great, but you
know nothing more about the person than what your
friend told you. Appearances can be deceiving. What
are the chances of success or a long lasting
relationship?
There
is another choice. We can change the way we view the
market. If you are used to fading the market and are
currently using a trend-following system you can try
to learn to trade with the trend. This requires you
to change and not the system. It is much easier to
change a trading system, or find one compatible with
you, than it is to change your personality to fit
the trading system. However, it is possible for some
to change, and may be quite beneficial as well.
Assuming
you have found a match made in heaven, why can it
still be hard to actually use the system? There are
many practical reasons for this. For example, assume
the market opens at 301 and a trend-following system
yields a sell signal if the market declines to 300.
An hour later a bearish news report sends the market
crashing to 300, but you do not want to put a sell
order in because of fear of a bad fill. The market
continues to drop to 299.50 where you place an order
to sell at 300 on a limit. The market trades up to
299.90 but then promptly collapses, never to see the
300 level for the rest of the day.
Is
this a worst case scenario that usually doesn't
happen? Yes, but trading methods, systems, and
traders do not get abandoned because they make
money consistently. They fade away because bad
periods and the loss of money also entails the
loss of confidence.
There
is a misconception that mechanical systems take
the emotion out of trading. Anyone who becomes
too emotional in making trading decisions may
not necessarily find solace in mechanical
systems. A trader using a trading system will
not magically abandon all feeling and emotion
and automatically begin dispassionately trading
by the dictates of the system. The individual
trying to subdue or eliminate emotional feelings
will have to consciously work on this,
irrespective of which trading method is chosen.
There
is another reason why some people find
mechanical trading systems troubling. When the
system is profitable, who made the money-the
system or the person? Perhaps there is more to
trading than simply making money. Many of us
seek success in what we have done--not what
someone else, or something else, has done. And
for those who are only in it for the money, they
will end up abandoning the system as soon as it
begins to lose money and renew their search for
the next great hope.